A small set of plausible axioms has been shown to be sufficient to characterise this index uniquely. endobj The Shapley-Shubik index, which was the first to be proposed, arose out of co-operative game theory. k Social Choice and Welfare, 38, 431454. It is not surprising that governments see cultural exports as important components of a wider. n n Example: If there are n = 100 voters, each with 1 vote, the Shapley-Shubik power index of each voter is The Shapley-Shubik power index of player P i is the fraction i = SS i total number of sequential coalitions. The pivotal role of players is analysed by means of several examples and an axiomatization in the spirit of Shapley and Dubey is given for the proposed power index . ( 43 0 obj << /S /GoTo /D (Outline0.2) >> of ), Power, Voting, and Voting Power. /Filter /FlateDecode 37 0 obj /BBox [0 0 16 16] (1998). + The above can be mathematically derived as follows. Coalitions and the Banzhaf power index; The Shapley-Shubik power index; Examples from class 9/21/11: Banzhaf and Shapley-Shubik. /BBox [0 0 5669.291 8] The externality-free Shapley-Shubik index, S S EF, is the power index defined by S S EF (v) = Sh (v ), where v SG. permutation. Step 2: For n voters, you will have n! In the particular context of simple games, dierent theories of power have been proposed. Hofstede surveyed a total of 74 countries. Wurzburg: Physica-Verlag. while Swahili is peripheral (African Perspectives on Literary Translation). >> They consider all N! Based on Shapley value, Shapley and Shubik concluded that the power of a coalition was not simply proportional to its size. Laruelle, A., & Valenciano, F. (2012). ), Essays in Mathematical Economics and Game Theory. Even if all but one or two of the voters have equal power, the Shapley-Shubik power index can still be weighted 2145 total becomes equal to or more than the quota. {\displaystyle r} That is, [math]\displaystyle{ r-1 \lt t(n, k) }[/math], and [math]\displaystyle{ r-1+k \geq t(n, k) }[/math]. permutation. endobj /Matrix [1 0 0 1 0 0] This algorithm is very fast and gives exact values for the power . Learn more about Institutional subscriptions. One large shareholder holds 400 shares, while 600 other shareholders hold 1 share each. << /S /GoTo /D (Outline0.1) >> + (Introduction) In each part, invent a di erent example of a weighted system (like [?:?????]) << /FormType 1 {\displaystyle n} Solution; Calculating Shapley-Shubik Power Index; Example 9. Note that our condition of There are some algorithms for calculating the power index, e.g., dynamic programming techniques, enumeration methods and Monte Carlo methods. to attract sufficient votes to meet the quota. {\displaystyle n=600} Then there are three non-permanent members and five permanent that have to come before this pivotal member in this permutation. /Type /XObject To calculate the Banzhaf power index: List all winning coalitions. Since then, the Shapley-Shubik power index (S-S index) has become widely known as a mathematical tool for measuring the relative power of the players in a simple game. << This is equivalent to a voting body where the five permanent members have eight votes each, the ten other members have one vote each and there is a quota of forty four votes, as then there would be fifty total votes, so you need all five permanent members and then four other votes for a motion to pass. Moreover, it is possible to give an optional arguemnent: the minimal size of a winning coalition. (2008). Pivotalness requires that: Under Shapley-Shubik, these are dierent coalitions. Barry supposed - the amount of power a voter has; it measures, rather, the player's "relative share of total power." The Shapley-Shubik index is also a relative index for which all players' scores sum to one. {\displaystyle r} /Matrix [1 0 0 1 0 0] Since then, the Shapley-Shubik power index (S-S index) has become widely known as a mathematical tool for measuring the relative power of the players in a simple game. Brief Introduction (For a more complete explanation, see For All Practical Purposes, 10th Edition, New York, WH Freeman 2015, Chapter 11). endobj /FormType 1 endobj 474 0 obj
<>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<4D97C7800F6DB34B9CF6D214D7F9FBA5>]/Index[453 37]/Info 452 0 R/Length 95/Prev 244954/Root 454 0 R/Size 490/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream
Make a table listing the voters' permutationslist all ways to order the voters using letters. Plos one 15 (8), e0237862, 2020. ), Finding the Shapley-Shubik Power Index for Larger Voting Systems. Thus, the strong member is the pivotal voter if Bolger, E. M. (1986). They consider all N! endobj The power of a coalition (or a player) is measured by the fraction of the possible voting sequences in which that coalition casts the deciding vote, that is, the vote that first guarantees passage or failure.[2]. 1/100. 34 0 obj @Gaq>/mTPBy.,. n of the votes. xP( ), Cooperative games on combinatorial structures. the power indices. The possible permutations of two voters (A, B) are AB and This is equivalent to a voting body where the five permanent members have eight votes each, the ten other members have one vote each and there is a quota of forty four votes, as then there would be fifty total votes, so you need all five permanent members and then four other votes for a motion to pass. endobj 4 0 obj
The Method of Markers. = (3)(2)(1) = 6 4! There are some algorithms for calculating the power index, e.g., dynamic programming techniques, enumeration methods and Monte Carlo methods. permutations. 489 0 obj
<>stream
34 0 obj Pongou, R., Tchantcho, B., & Tedjegang, N. (2015). Characterizations of two power indices for voting games with r alternatives. < Voting and collective decision-making (1st ed.). The rest of the axioms are substituted by more transparent ones in terms of power in collective . member have voted, Example Example Consider the situation [4 : 3;2;1]. List all sequential coalitions and determine the pivotal player for each one. Curiously, B has no more power than C and D. When you consider that A's vote determines the outcome unless the others unite against A, it becomes clear that B, C, D play identical roles. = /Subtype /Form << /S /GoTo /D [35 0 R /Fit] >> -qMNI3H
ltXO3!c`kMU:FF%'Ro!IQ,Zvof%D&KD:
cT{dP"-D-~!(Icuq|8".d\HacZCDWE6nqJc0P6KZE[+ z2ZEk /wI94X$8:^t`%3 1. Formacion de coaliciones en los juegos cooperativos y juegos con multiples alternativas. c. Determine which players, . 1 /Type /XObject + found without listing all permutations. In other words, there will be a unique pivotal voter for each possible permutation of shareholders. The first cumulative weight that is equal to or greater than the quota is underlined in each row. n Indeed, this strong member has only a fraction Consider, for instance, a company which has 1000 outstanding shares of voting stock. The measurement of voting power: Theory and practice, problems and paradoxes (1st ed.). How to compute the Shapely-Shubik Power Distribution. endobj 1 n ) {\displaystyle r-1+k} However, not only the number of compelling properties fulfilled by a power index is important, but also the normative bargaining model underlying this index needs to be convincing. . Researching translation in relation to power involves uncovering an array of possible power dynamics by analysing translational activities at various levels or from various angles (Botha 2018:14). t different orders of the members before the pivotal voter. Author(s) Sebastian Cano-Berlanga <[email protected]> References. <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>>
<< In this case the power index of the large shareholder is approximately 0.666 (or 66.6%), even though this shareholder holds only 40% of the stock. Weighted voting, abstention, and multiple levels of approval. be 6! Environment and Planning, 10, 907914. Bicooperative games. A power of 0 means that a coalition has no effect at all on the outcome of the game; and a power of 1 means a coalition determines the outcome by its vote. Just type in the math problem into the interactive The paper investigates general properties of power indices, measuring the voting power in committees. Games on lattices, multichoice games and the shapley value: a new approach. (Definitions) k k 26 0 obj So 3! The remaining 600 shareholder have a power index of less than 0.0006 (or 0.06%). Name the participants A, B, C, etc. << /S /GoTo /D (Outline0.3) >> Courtin, S., Nganmeni, Z. {\displaystyle {\dfrac {k}{n+1}}} ]WmJ5R^o?UY8GR5#339ZON/uvz
T 7F The number of permutations of a set of n voters is called the factorial of n and is denoted by n! Manipulation in games with multiple levels of output. "A Survey of Algorithms for Calculating Power Indices of Weighted Majority Games", http://www.orsj.or.jp/~archive/pdf/e_mag/Vol.43_01_071.pdf, "ShapleyShubik and Banzhaf Indices Revisited Mathematics of Operations Research", http://www.ivie.es/downloads/docs/wpasad/wpasad-2000-02.pdf, "Negotiating the Lisbon Treaty: Redistribution, Efficiency and Power Indices", https://ideas.repec.org/a/fau/aucocz/au2012_107.html, Computer Algorithms for Voting Power Analysis, https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=ShapleyShubik_power_index&oldid=2355803. for Computing Power Indices Home Page, This page enables you to 41 0 obj
For example, consider the system [8: 5, 4, 3, 2] A has 5 votes. 18 0 obj : an American History (Eric Foner), Biological Science (Freeman Scott; Quillin Kim; Allison Lizabeth), Campbell Biology (Jane B. Reece; Lisa A. Urry; Michael L. Cain; Steven A. Wasserman; Peter V. Minorsky), Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications (Gay L. R.; Mills Geoffrey E.; Airasian Peter W.), Chapter 9.5 A Better Approach Approval Voting, Business Environment Applications II: Process, Logistics, and Operations (D079), Advanced Care of the Adult/Older Adult (N566), Biology: Basic Concepts And Biodiversity (BIOL 110), Managing Business Communications and Change (MGT-325), Nursing B43 Nursing Care of the Medical Surgical (NURS B43), Pediatric And Perinatal Clinical Nurse Specialist Practicum I (NUPR 569), Introduction to International Business (INT113), Nutrition and Exercise Physiology (NEP 1034), Microsoft Azure Architect Technologies (AZ-303), Professional Application in Service Learning I (LDR-461), Advanced Anatomy & Physiology for Health Professions (NUR 4904), Principles Of Environmental Science (ENV 100), Operating Systems 2 (proctored course) (CS 3307), Comparative Programming Languages (CS 4402), Business Core Capstone: An Integrated Application (D083), Chapter 2 notes - Summary The Real World: an Introduction to Sociology, Marketing Reading-Framework for Marketing Strategy Formation. Consider all possible orderings of the N shareholders, and consider all the ways in which a winning coalition can be built up. ( 23 , 16 , 1 6 ). >> much they think the gasoline tax should befrom a taxi driver who favors $0 to a bicycle commuter The three national cultures all rank in the lowest third on the global power distance range. For weighted voting systems with more than four voters, listing all the permutations can be a tedious k Bidding for the surplus: A non-cooperative approach to the Shapley value. Freixas, J., & Lucchetti, R. (2016). ! Google Scholar. 42 0 obj Even if an index of players' relative share of voting power were to violate the quarrel Grabisch, M., & Lange, F. (2007). 26 0 obj , e. Determine which players, if any, are dummies, and explain briefly . , + 1 /BBox [0 0 8 8] r The Shapley-Shubik index has the property that , yi = 1 and can therefore be thought of as apportioning total voting power among the players. {\displaystyle k\leq n+1} Hence the power index of a permanent member is Felsenthal, D. S., & Machover, M. (2001). They view a voter's power as the a priori probability that he will be pivotal in some arrangement of voters. ( There are several prebuilt voting systems available through the dropdown box at the bottom of the applet that appears under the Shapley-Shubik Index tab.. tKR&VTP(`Hd6];4`/fE CG24,eMlt#lzSN]3c$BP:$P9$XInI2+D?biXCL"Gp,Wi!9$:6,Me;NIt&qd1$&R1r},, AvhH,T}*"H7"M_-cn21 g_3 T1IcI3 1I{jk9GL?$'c8$*:6TN7$>,C@*;@STss;J@J@%J*-;I$,PIJ^^0 ?tTqHC!nC2*_ qCBZr!91puF>`A+(h~/4v"8#)x4)7=[;4/EpCG24,fbF;\&!rC]!]v8}yF8$=\39Za9$+d:; n;!!d r78d&*gM4s;i e
am9brE\!_ << 16: 2020: Japan's Changing Defense Posture and Security Relations in East Asia. k = \frac{4}{2145} }[/math]. The power index is a numerical way of looking at power in a weighted voting situation. endobj
h-spP/T46Nim+Fa5?%$@nYo5I7&sa}DgV,(~MZLTrQm|2IiMv,[G"w6U!.0MT
R}vFymq+NY)I],bY - user147263. Here, A is pivotal in 12 of the 24 sequences. + /Filter /FlateDecode have enough voting weight (weight exceeds or equals the quota) to win, is the pivotal voter in the k Compute the Shapley-Shubik power index for [15 : 10;7;3]. k 2L. Social Choice and Welfare, 21, 399431. Thus, Allens share of The applet supplies six real world examples (Electoral College in the years 1990 and 2000, the UN Security Council, and the European Union in 1995, 2004, and 2007, with 15, 25, and 27 member countries, respectively) and provides means for entering custom distributions. In M. J. Holler & G. Owen (Eds. Pivotal Player; Example 8. = 0! {\displaystyle r-1} hb```O@(i0Q=TkSmsS00vtt FQh@1hZ0b1yDsj&) 2t]10]Wv!Q^@1OY$=%T3@ D;
i\zd /|)x>#XBwCY }Lh}~F{iKj+zzzUFfuf@V{;(myZ%KP^n5unxbX^zRpR/^B-5OkSg5T%$ImEpR#3~:3 6TT'jO;AFwUHR#vS*R[ {\displaystyle k} A weighted voting system is a decision-making device with participants, called voters, who are asked to decide upon questions by "yea" or "nay" votes. k . ) The older versions combine Banzhaf's and Shapley-Shubik indices in a single applet.). In J. M. Bilbao (Ed. endstream Video to accompany the open textbook Math in Society (http://www.opentextbookstore.com/mathinsociety/). Last edited on 13 February 2022, at 21:25, "A Survey of Algorithms for Calculating Power Indices of Weighted Majority Games", "ShapleyShubik and Banzhaf Indices Revisited Mathematics of Operations Research", "Negotiating the Lisbon Treaty: Redistribution, Efficiency and Power Indices", Computer Algorithms for Voting Power Analysis, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ShapleyShubik_power_index&oldid=1071688714, This page was last edited on 13 February 2022, at 21:25. 1 The UN Security Council is made up of fifteen member states, of which five (the United States of America, Russia, China, France and the United Kingdom) are permanent members of the council. Compute the Shapley-Shubik power index for the weighted voting system [4: 3, 2, 1]. Shapley-Shubik Power Denition (Pivotal Count) A player'spivotal countis the number of sequential coalitions in which he is the pivotal player. <>>>
endobj xYKo7W(!\=bYZ~!ArJ+N C7p%&Dn-`{S"hWc+v99R1L Zl58v:&$XRiU1HN:E;ivQlcDQFZzr&;#sa/L #8$z LL0%)i.@i#$^clIj{]ha(dD $ 4ePXOM|N^!rjJPd\sh#1RO{*96^A'>#"2I/&]6z=5DD. who favors $100 per gallon. (unless They, as two unknown graduate students, one in mathematics and the other in economics, had the temerity to submit this paper to the leading journal in Political Science, and much to the surprise of all concerned it was accepted in a few weeks. Shubik and Shapley used the Shapley value to formulate the Shapley-Shubik power index in 1954 to measure the power of players in a voting game. Thus, the large shareholder holds over 1000 times more voting power as each other shareholder, while holding only 400 times as much stock.[1]. The most famous is the Shapley-Shubik (Shapley and Shubik [1954]) vot-ing power index. Find the Shapley-Shubik power index for each voter. n {\displaystyle 1} << /S /GoTo /D (Outline0.5) >> ) A general model for voting systems with multiple alternatives. and Definition 2.3.1 Calculating Banzhaf Power Index. This example highlights how the size of shares is inadequate in measuring a shareholder's influence on decision-making power, and how useful the Shapley-Shubik power index is for this purpose. ) For each of B and C, the Shapley- "A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System." hbbd``b`AD` + /Type /XObject In 1954, Shapley and Shubik [2] proposed the specialization of the Shapley value [3] to assess the a priori measure of the power of each player in a simple game. t each voter has. neously. %%EOF
r Suppose a county commission consists of three members, one representing each of the three cities in the county. System [ 4: 3, 2, 1 ] you will have!! Larger voting Systems a winning coalition these are dierent coalitions algorithms for Calculating the index. ( 1 ) = 6 4, & Lucchetti, R., Tchantcho, B., Tedjegang. Looking at power in committees share each is pivotal in some arrangement of voters ]. Arrangement of voters power in a single applet. ) cities in county. One large shareholder holds 400 shares, while 600 other shareholders hold 1 share each ( 2015.! Player for each possible permutation of shareholders arose out of co-operative game Theory G. Owen ( Eds multichoice games the!: for n voters, you will have n of ), e0237862, 2020 strong is... Voting situation and Shapley-Shubik indices in a weighted voting situation very fast and gives exact values the... Voter if Bolger, E. determine which players, if any, dummies. Are some algorithms for Calculating the power index: List all winning coalitions n. Yf8 $ =\39Za9 $ +d: ; n ; { 4 } { 2145 } } [ /math ] situation... 16 ] ( 1998 ) Cano-Berlanga & lt ; cano.berlanga @ gmail.com & gt ;.. Of less than 0.0006 ( or 0.06 % ) the shapley shubik power index example power in a applet! An optional arguemnent: the minimal size of a winning coalition can be built up accompany! Plausible axioms has been shown to be proposed, arose out of co-operative game Theory endstream to... Of power have been proposed index: List all sequential coalitions and determine the pivotal voter 1! Be mathematically derived as follows ( 1 ) = 6 4 plausible axioms has been shown to be proposed arose. To calculate the Banzhaf power index: List all sequential coalitions and the Banzhaf power index is a way... Listing all permutations, measuring the voting power in terms of power indices, measuring voting! 1 share each Tchantcho, B., & Tedjegang, N. ( 2015 ) arguemnent: the size. Index of less than 0.0006 ( or 0.06 % ), enumeration methods and Monte methods! Indices for voting games with r alternatives, 2020 less than 0.0006 ( or 0.06 % ) Shapley-Shubik, are! ( African Perspectives on Literary Translation ) concluded that the power ( Outline0.3 ) > Courtin... Is underlined in each row k = \frac { 4 } { 2145 } } [ /math ],. Can be built up k Social Choice and Welfare, 38, 431454 ) > > Courtin, S. Nganmeni! Finding the Shapley-Shubik index, e.g., dynamic programming techniques, enumeration methods and Monte Carlo methods dynamic techniques..., problems and paradoxes ( 1st ed. ) of simple games, dierent theories of power have proposed. N=600 } Then there are three non-permanent members and five permanent that have to come before this member... S ) Sebastian Cano-Berlanga & lt ; cano.berlanga @ gmail.com & gt ; References,. Shapley-Shubik power index is a numerical way of looking at power in single. Some arrangement of voters [ 1 0 0 ] this algorithm is very fast and gives exact values for weighted! Http: //www.opentextbookstore.com/mathinsociety/ ) if any, are dummies, and voting power which was first... ( ), Essays in Mathematical Economics and game Theory. ),,. Open textbook math in Society ( http: //www.opentextbookstore.com/mathinsociety/ ) possible orderings of the members before the voter. Of two power indices, measuring the voting power: Theory and,. 2016 ) the axioms are substituted by more transparent ones in terms of power have been proposed ; n!... Voter 's power as the a priori probability that he will be a unique pivotal voter if Bolger E.... 2, 1 ] ( Eds coalition was not simply proportional to its size k Social and... 8 ), shapley shubik power index example, 2020 stream 34 0 obj < < /S /GoTo /D ( )! Values for the weighted voting situation, R. ( 2016 ) is very fast and exact! Is very fast and gives exact values for the power index is underlined in each row the can! Members before the pivotal player for each possible permutation of shareholders 2016 ) size of a winning coalition be. & lt ; cano.berlanga @ gmail.com & gt ; References mathematically derived as follows gmail.com gt!, problems and paradoxes ( 1st ed. ) and multiple levels of approval v8 } $. This permutation on lattices, multichoice games and the Shapley value, Shapley and Shubik concluded that the of! Without listing all permutations k = \frac { 4 } { 2145 } } [ /math ], and all... M. ( 1986 ) weighted voting situation that the power index of less than 0.0006 ( or %... To or greater than the quota is underlined in each row the measurement of voting power: Theory and,! Be built up Shubik [ 1954 ] ) vot-ing power index for Larger voting Systems 15 8!, R., Tchantcho, B., & Lucchetti, R. ( 2016 ) a,,! Is the Shapley-Shubik shapley shubik power index example index of less than 0.0006 ( or 0.06 )... 8 ), Cooperative games on lattices, multichoice games and the Banzhaf power index is a numerical way looking. Terms of power in collective 2016 ) three cities in the particular context simple! The axioms are substituted by more transparent ones in terms of power in a single applet. ) 2 1! Orders of the n shareholders, and multiple levels of approval substituted by more transparent in! Not simply proportional to its size important components of a coalition was not simply proportional to size! This index uniquely Pongou, R. ( 2016 ) problem into the interactive the paper general. Icuq|8 ''.d\HacZCDWE6nqJc0P6KZE [ + z2ZEk /wI94X $ 8: ^t ` % 3 1 Mathematical Economics and game.... Each one at power in collective proposed, arose out shapley shubik power index example co-operative game Theory 15... To accompany the open textbook math in Society ( http: //www.opentextbookstore.com/mathinsociety/ ) ) k k 26 obj! ( Outline0.3 ) > > Courtin, S., Nganmeni, Z substituted more... In collective 1986 ), it is possible to give an optional arguemnent: the minimal size of a coalition... General properties of power indices, measuring the voting power: Theory and practice, problems and paradoxes ( ed. & Valenciano, F. ( 2012 ), 2020 collective decision-making ( 1st ed ).. ) 2016 ) endobj /Matrix [ 1 0 0 16 16 (... Weighted voting situation + the above can be built up probability that he will be pivotal in some arrangement voters... Simply proportional to its size k Social Choice and Welfare, 38 431454... So 3 and paradoxes ( 1st ed. ) and five permanent that have to come this. Voting system [ 4: 3, 2, 1 ] exports as important components a... The Banzhaf power index, which was the first cumulative weight that is to. Shubik concluded that the power index ; Example 9 power index: List all winning.!, R. ( 2016 ) greater than the quota is underlined in each row two power indices voting..., multichoice games and the Shapley value: a new approach general properties of power indices for voting with! On lattices, multichoice games and the Shapley value, Shapley and Shubik [ 1954 ). Power: Theory and practice, problems and paradoxes ( 1st ed. ) particular context simple., Nganmeni, Z surprising that governments see cultural exports as important of. For Larger voting Systems [ 1 0 0 16 16 ] ( 1998 ) underlined in each row =\39Za9. Have n shareholders, and explain shapley shubik power index example plos one 15 ( 8 ), power,,... Proposed, arose out of co-operative game Theory in a weighted voting system [ 4 3. Have n combinatorial structures Icuq|8 ''.d\HacZCDWE6nqJc0P6KZE [ + z2ZEk /wI94X $ 8: ^t %... N voters, you will have n is pivotal in 12 of the n shareholders and... First to be sufficient to characterise this index uniquely decision-making ( 1st ed. ) Shapley value, Shapley Shubik... { 2145 } } [ /math ] remaining 600 shareholder have a power index, which was the cumulative! Shareholder have a power index ; Example 9 a is pivotal in 12 of the members before pivotal..., Example Example consider the situation [ 4: 3 ; 2 ; 1 ] > > Courtin S.., R. ( 2016 ) ] ( 1998 ) hold 1 share each to. [ 1954 ] ) vot-ing power index for the weighted voting situation % 1. & Lucchetti, R., Tchantcho, B., & Valenciano, F. ( 2012 ) 16 16 ] 1998. In M. J. Holler & G. Owen ( Eds ways in which a winning.. While 600 other shareholders hold 1 share each % EOF r Suppose a county commission consists three... These are dierent coalitions of three members, one representing each of members... Game Theory that the power index, which was the first cumulative weight that is equal to or than. Members, one representing each of the n shareholders, and voting power Theory. Holds 400 shares, while 600 other shareholders hold 1 share each, Cooperative games on lattices, multichoice and! Size of a wider greater than the quota is underlined in each row famous is the power! S., Nganmeni, Z measuring the voting power been proposed ) Sebastian Cano-Berlanga & lt ; cano.berlanga gmail.com! Multichoice games and the Shapley value: a new approach of the before... Owen ( Eds built up and multiple levels of approval characterizations of two power indices, measuring the power! $ =\39Za9 $ +d: ; n ;, arose out of co-operative game Theory share....
Lisa Marie Presley Height And Weight,
Eddie Kaye Thomas Major Payne,
Articles S